Abortion Barbie Wendy Davis isn’t fit to govern her personal life, let alone the state of Texas

Leftists are telling a heartwarming bootstrap tale about their heroine Abortion Barbie Wendy Davis. Look a bit closer and the story falls apart.

Davis was 21, not 19, when she was divorced. She lived only a few months in the family mobile home while separated from her husband before moving into an apartment with her daughter.

A single mother working two jobs, she met Jeff Davis, a lawyer 13 years older than her, married him and had a second daughter. He paid for her last two years at Texas Christian University and her time at Harvard Law School, and kept their two daughters while she was in Boston. When they divorced in 2005, he was granted parental custody, and the girls stayed with him. Wendy Davis was directed to pay child support.

Hmmmn. Well this is much more interesting isn’t it? Wendy Davis’s second husband cashed in his 401k and took out a loan to pay for her Harvard degree… to repay his kindness she cheated on him and leaving the marriage the day after the loan was paid off in full.

Wendy was happy to give custody of her daughters to her ex husband, and was ordered to pay child support. One of those kids is from a previous marriage. Fortunate for Amber that she was college aged when her mom felt this way:

“She said, ‘I think you’re right; you’ll make a good, nurturing father. While I’ve been a good mother, it’s not a good time for me right now.’”

She gave up custody of her teenaged daughter in order to pursue a career in politics. This person is Hillary Clinton’s baby sister; politically driven and motivated only by power.

Know the facts on Wendy Davis.

Is this person fit to govern the state of Texas?
Read more in reporting by the Dallas News….

The Weekly Thomas Sowell

This is your weekly dose of Thomas Sowell. Because if every American read and understood the great economist, we would still be operating as a Constitutional Republic instead of the Imperial Edict of Obama.

“Three-fifths to two-thirds of the federal budget consists of taking property from one American and giving it to another. Were a private person to do the same thing, we’d call it theft. When government does it, we euphemistically call it income redistribution, but that’s exactly what thieves do — redistribute income.”

20140107-230353.jpg